Analysis essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 words - 2

Analysis - Essay Example Thoreau’s character is discernible from his ability as a writer and philosopher. His principles were strong enough for him to accept a jail term without resistance. As a result, his concept associates with the willingness to suffer, and it manages to transcend through generations. In Thoreau’s opinion, life is about cooperating with good deeds and ensuring that the society is led in a justified manner. Concerning leadership, he asserts, "That government is best which governs least" (Thoreau). He believes that governments are not necessary because they are sometimes, inadvisable. This is evident in the present societal context where governments are oppressive. It is necessary to prioritize right over wrong. One’s conscience must be over the laws that govern a territory. For instance, the laws on slavery were quite oppressive for many slaves, but some White settlers nevertheless encouraged slavery because of the existing policies. According to Thoreau, people should not follow the law if it undermines their dignity. Although evil is unavoidable, one should not indulge or be part of the evil. Thoreau demonstrated this when he refused to pay taxes in rebellion to the tyrannical government (Gross 11). In the present society, the United States engages in war, for instance, the war in Afghanistan. Thoreau sees this as an oppressive process that signifies an unjust government that performs evil actions, even on powerless members in the society. Thoreau confirms that there is no use of reforms in government institutions. Despite the change of regimes and election processes, little change occurs within political circles, and the populace fails to enjoy the accompanying advantages that come with change. Thoreau ideologically distanced himself from the government and its related institutions because of its greed. This is evident in the present society in